[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1162980254.12585.4.camel@nigel.suspend2.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 21:04:14 +1100
From: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@...uxmail.org>
To: Alessandro Suardi <alessandro.suardi@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.19-rc5
Hi.
On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 10:59 +0100, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
> On 11/8/06, Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@...uxmail.org> wrote:
> > Gidday.
> >
> > On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 18:33 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > Ok, things are finally calming down, it seems.
> > >
> > > The -rc5 thing is mainly a few random architecture updates (arm, mips,
> > > uml, avr, power) and the only really noticeable one there is likely some
> > > fixes to the local APIC accesses on x86, which apparently fixes a few
> > > machines.
> > >
> > > The rest is really mostly one-liners (or close) to various subsystems. New
> > > PCI ID's, trivial fixes, cifs, dvb, things like that. I'm feeling better
> > > about this - there may be a -rc6, but maybe we don't even need one.
> > >
> > > As usual, thanks to everybody who tested and chased down some of the
> > > regressions,
> > >
> > > Linus
> >
> > The patch etc doesn't seem to be available yet. (The front page is still
> > showing -rc4, for example).
>
> The patch is available, it's just the kernel.org home that
> isn't updated.
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing/patch-2.6.19-rc5.bz2
Ta. I was more concerned that whoever needs to fix whatever's broken
knows the issue exists.
Regards,
Nigel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists