[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4551AD0A.4080309@qumranet.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 12:10:18 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/14] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine (v4)
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>> The problem with that is that the test comes too late: after we've
>> configured. Andrew wants to keep allmodconfig working, and for that we
>> need to deselect CONFIG_KVM before compilation starts.
>>
>
> not really. You can also select to just not compile kvm at all *from the
> Makefile*
>
Yes. And then a real user (not an allmodconfig user) selects CONFIG_KVM
and wonders where it went.
For users, we want it to fail fatally. For allmodconfig, we want it to
succeed but don't care about the output.
>> gcc.*protector.sh only affects the Makefile, not the configuration, AFAICT.
>>
>
> but it is the Makefile that goes into the kvm directory and compiles
> stuff!
>
> yes it's ugly and not so elegant, but it's effective and you can warn
> bigtime via nasty messages if you want ;)
>
We already have an ugly solution:
#define VMLAUNCH ".byte 0x0f, foo, bar"
etc. We were looking for an elegant one.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists