[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061108162202.GA4729@stusta.de>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:22:02 +0100
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc5: known regressions
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 07:47:07AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >
> > I haven't seen anyone reproduce this but Tim Chen, and Tim wasn't
> > able to root cause the problem so I believe we are going to have
> > this regression :(
>
> Note that you really shouldn't look too closely at lmbench scheduling
> fluctuations. They can fluctuate a _lot_, especially under SMP, and it can
> depend on things like cache layout that has nothing to do with the
> scheduler (ie just code movement can make the lmbench numbers change).
>
> So there are "regressions" and there are "shit happens". It can sometimes
> be hard to tell the two apart, of course ;)
There's perhaps one thing that might help us to see whether it's just a
benchmark effekt or a real problem:
With Tim's CONFIG_NR_CPUS=8, NR_IRQS only increases from 224 in 2.6.18
to 512 in 2.6.19-rc.
With CONFIG_NR_CPUS=255, NR_IRQS increases from 224 in 2.6.18
to 8416 in 2.6.19-rc.
@Tim:
Can you try CONFIG_NR_CPUS=255 with both 2.6.18 and 2.6.19-rc5?
> Linus
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists