lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 8 Nov 2006 13:19:36 -0500
From:	Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
To:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc:	"Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso" <blaisorblade@...oo.it>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: slow UML on x86-64, soft lockups

On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 04:51:55PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Recent 2.6.18 / 2.6.19-rc kernels run at the expected speed, on 32-bit 
> x86, with a Fedora Core 5 or 6 UML userland.  However, on 64-bit x86-64 
> with a 64-bit UML userland, the kernel is achingly slow.  It works, 
> but...  Login takes several minutes (via ssh from host or xterm 
> console), and soft lockup traces continually print to the screen (see 
> output below).  Once logged into, programs work, but again, very slowly. 
>  Commands which complete in under a second normally often takes minutes.
> 
> Any ideas?  I guess there is a bug in the 64-bit UML timer code?

Has this changed?  If so, what's different?

What does UML look like on the host?  I.e. what processes are running,
and what does strace say that they're doing?

What does it look like inside UML?  Anything running wild in there?

				Jeff
-- 
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists