linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i386: make BUG() expansion look like instruction

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:41:43 +0000 (GMT)
From:	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
To:	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>
cc:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386: make BUG() expansion look like instruction

On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Jan Beulich wrote:
> This gets i386's handle_BUG() in sync with x86-64's, namely introducing
> a 'struct bug_frame' and arranging for the code generated by the BUG()
> macro to represent an instruction, so that disassembling code
> containing such constructs doesn't produce garbage anymore. The
> resulting increase of code size is marginal (1 byte per instance).

I thought we were heading towards merging Jeremy's generic-bug-*
(with file and line in another section), in -mm for a while now?

Hugh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/