[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061108235203.GA7987@sergelap.austin.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:52:03 -0600
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@...gai.gr.jp>,
Chris Friedhoff <chris@...edhoff.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] security: introduce fs caps
Quoting Alexey Dobriyan (adobriyan@...il.com):
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 04:24:53PM -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > +struct vfs_cap_data_struct {
>
> "_struct" suffix is useless here: "struct" is already typed.
Good point.
> > + __u32 version;
> > + __u32 effective;
> > + __u32 permitted;
> > + __u32 inheritable;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static inline void convert_to_le(struct vfs_cap_data_struct *cap)
> > +{
> > + cap->version = le32_to_cpu(cap->version);
> > + cap->effective = le32_to_cpu(cap->effective);
> > + cap->permitted = le32_to_cpu(cap->permitted);
> > + cap->inheritable = le32_to_cpu(cap->inheritable);
> > +}
>
> This pretty much defeats sparse endian checking. You will get warnings
> regardless of whether u32 or le32 are used.
But I don't get any sparse warnings with make C=1. Am I doing something
wrong? Will it give warnings only on some architectures?
thanks,
-serge
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists