[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061107233323.c984fa9b.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 23:33:23 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
Cc: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>, kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/14] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine (v4)
On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 09:14:50 +0200
Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com> wrote:
> Roland Dreier wrote:
> > > That's gas 2.16.1. I assume it needs some super-new binutils.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure what to do about this. What's the minimum version?
> >
> > According to http://kvm.sourceforge.net/howto.html :
> > A recent enough binutils (>= 2.16.91.0.2) for vmx instruction support
> >
>
> Either that or a bunch of ugly .byte macros.
>
I think we could live with the binutils requirement as long as we can find
some automagic way of not breaking people's `make allmodconfig'. Because
quite a lot of those people who do cross-compilation tend to use older
binutilses.
But I don't know how to do that. We _could_ do a trick similar to the
`cc-version' make rule, and then use the new `as-version' to make the whole
kvm.o compile down to an empty .o file. But that's pretty hacky. Would
really prefer something at Kconfig-time, but we have no way of letting the
assembler version feed into the Kconfig system (nor do we want it, I
suspect).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists