[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1162979130.7805.80.camel@sebastian.intellilink.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:45:30 +0900
From: Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
<fernando@....ntt.co.jp>
To: Jes Sorensen <jes@....com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
bjorn_helgaas@...com, Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Robin Holt <holt@....com>, Dean Nelson <dcn@....com>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
linux-ia64 <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] mspec driver: compile error
On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 10:42 +0100, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 13:35 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > The problem occurs because i386 (as expected) does not define
> > IA64_UNCACHED_ALLOCATOR. I thought that making the select expression
> > depend on IA64 as shown below might silence allmodconfig:
> >
> > select IA64_UNCACHED_ALLOCATOR if IA64
> >
> > But my guess was wrong and the same warning appeared. It seems that "if"
> > expressions do not prevent allmodconfig from checking the symbol
> > indicated by the select the "if" is conditioning. By the way, is this
> > the expected behaviour? If so, we need to get rid of the reverse
> > dependency, modify the "depends on" line accordingly, and make
> > IA64_UNCACHED_ALLOCATOR selectable. I may be missing the whole point so
> > please correct if I am wrong.
>
> This patch is a bad solution as it requires people to manually select
> the uncached allocator. It should be enabled automatically by MSPEC,
> not the other way round.
>
> Given that MSPEC is clearly marked as depending on IA64, it seems bogus
> for i386 allmodconfig to barf over it and the problem should be fixed
> there instead IMHO.
Agreed. That is why I asked if that was allmodconfig's expected
behaviour. Andrew?
Cheers,
Fernando
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists