linux-kernel - XFS filesystem performance drop in kernels 2.6.16+

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bde600590611090930g3ab97aq3c76d7bca4ec267f@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 9 Nov 2006 20:30:23 +0300
From:	"Igor A. Valcov" <viaprog@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: XFS filesystem performance drop in kernels 2.6.16+

Hello,

For one of our projects we have a test program that measures file
system performance by writing up to 1000 files simultaneously. After
installing kernel v2.6.16 we noticed that XFS performance dropped by a
factor of 5 (tests that took around 4 minutes on kernel 2.6.15 now
take around 20 minutes to complete). We then checked all kernels
starting from 2.6.16 up to 2.6.19-rc5 with the same unpleasant result.
The funny thing about all this is that we chose XFS for that
particular project specifically because it was about 5 times faster
with the tests than the other file systems. Now they all take about
the same time.

I also noticed that I/O barriers were introduced in v2.6.16 and
thought they may be the cause, but mounting the file system with
'nobarrier' doesn't seem to affect the performance in any way.

Any thoughts on the matter are appreciated.

Thanks in advance,

-- 
Igor A. Valcov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/