linux-kernel - Re: [Fastboot] Kexec with latest kernel fail

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 9 Nov 2006 15:11:18 -0500
From:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...ibm.com>
To:	Jay Lan <jlan@....com>
Cc:	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Fastboot mailing list <fastboot@...ts.osdl.org>,
	ebiederm@...ssion.com, "Lu, Yinghai" <yinghai.lu@....com>
Subject: Re: [Fastboot] Kexec with latest kernel fail

On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 12:06:38PM -0800, Jay Lan wrote:
> Don Zickus wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 08:07:22PM -0800, Lu, Yinghai wrote:
> >> Eric,
> >>
> >> I got "Invalid memory segment 0x100000 - ..."
> >> using kexec latest kernel...
> > 
> > I usually see this when people forget to add the "crashkernel=X@Y" into
> > their /etc/grub.conf kernel command line.  Where X and Y are arch
> > specific.
> 
> I have had "Invalid memory segment 0x4000000 - 0x4997fff" problem with
> '-l' option _always_. Since my priority was on '-p' i did not spent time
> on debugging this problem yet...
> 
> Maybe this "crashkerenl=X@Y" was the cause of my problem? Some platform
> can not specify a location to load so that it is legal to only specify
> "crashkernel=X" now. Is it possible '-l' code path still expect to
> see Y?
> 

kexec -l patch does not worry about crashkernel=. Only kexec -p path
does. So this is something else.

Thanks
Vivek
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/