[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061109211722.GA2616@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 22:17:22 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dm-devel@...hat.com, Srinivasa DS <srinivasa@...ibm.com>,
Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...pend2.net>,
David Chinner <dgc@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.19 5/5] fs: freeze_bdev with semaphore not mutex
Hi!
> > > OTOH I have no idea _how_ we can tell xfs that the processes have been
> > > frozen. Should we introduce a global flag for that or something?
> >
> > I guess XFS should just do all the writes from process context, and
> > refuse any writing when its threads are frozen... I actually still
> > believe it is doing the right thing, because you can't really write to
> > disk from timer.
>
> This is from a work queue, so in fact from a process context, but from
> a process that is running with PF_NOFREEZE.
Why not simply &~ PF_NOFREEZE on that particular process? Filesystems
are free to use threads/work queues/whatever, but refrigerator should
mean "no writes to filesystem" for them...
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists