linux-kernel - Re: Strange write errors on FAT32 partition (maybe an FAT32 bug?!)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4553A6C9.4010906@scientia.net>
Date:	Thu, 09 Nov 2006 23:08:09 +0100
From:	Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@...entia.net>
To:	Roger Heflin <rheflin@...pa.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Strange write errors on FAT32 partition (maybe an FAT32 bug?!)

Roger Heflin wrote:
> The mc part does pci parity, it is separate from the
> chipset driver,
What? I thought the MC part does ECC and the pci part the parity stuff?

> I have even used the _mc part on a
> Itanium with no chipset driver at all and had it report
> parity errors properly, so I expect just the mc driver
> to work.
>
> You would need the k8 module for the cpu, but that is
> only if you want ECC checking also.
>   
Where do I get this only when patching from CVS?

> If you got the _mc loaded do a "sysctl -a | grep mc" and
> see what things are set how, and reset if necessary
> check_pci_parity to 1.
Well ok,.. module is loaded now:
I've set check_pci_parity to 1 everything else is 0 in sysfs...


# sysctl -a | grep mc
error: "Operation not permitted" reading key "net.ipv6.route.flush"
net.ipv6.neigh.eth1.mcast_solicit = 3
net.ipv6.neigh.eth0.mcast_solicit = 3
net.ipv6.neigh.lo.mcast_solicit = 3
net.ipv6.neigh.default.mcast_solicit = 3
net.ipv4.conf.ppp0.mc_forwarding = 0
net.ipv4.conf.eth1.mc_forwarding = 0
net.ipv4.conf.eth0.mc_forwarding = 0
net.ipv4.conf.lo.mc_forwarding = 0
net.ipv4.conf.default.mc_forwarding = 0
net.ipv4.conf.all.mc_forwarding = 0
net.ipv4.neigh.ppp0.mcast_solicit = 3
net.ipv4.neigh.eth1.mcast_solicit = 3
net.ipv4.neigh.eth0.mcast_solicit = 3
net.ipv4.neigh.lo.mcast_solicit = 3
net.ipv4.neigh.default.mcast_solicit = 3
error: "Operation not permitted" reading key "net.ipv4.route.flush"
error: "Invalid argument" reading key "fs.binfmt_misc.register"


But this has nothing to do with edac, has it?

And I've already had diff errors again,..
so if there had been some parity issue it should have been logged, right?

View attachment "calestyo.vcf" of type "text/x-vcard" (156 bytes)