[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1163111737.4982.40.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 09:35:37 +1100
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add dev_sysdata and use it for ACPI
On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 17:04 +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 11:45:21 +1100,
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@....ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > - Add a dev_sysdata structure to struct device whose content is arch
> > specific. It will allow architectures like powerpc, arm, i386, ... who
> > need different types of DMA ops for busses and other kind of auxilliary
> > data for devices in general (numa node id, firmware data, etc...) to put
> > them in there, without bloating all architectures. The patch adds an
> > empty definition for the structure to all architectures.
>
> I like this. If we could move the dma stuff in there, we could get rid
> of it on s390 where it is just bloat we drag around...
>
> (Maybe dev_archdata would be a better name, since the definition is
> architecture specific?)
Hrm... I wonder why I posted from my IBM address :-) I have no firm
preference on the name of the structure. So far, I had no feedback on
that patch at all appart from yours though.
Andrew, Greg ? Is that something you would take for 2.6.20 ? I need to
know wether I should rework my patches to use that or stick to my hacks
involving hijacking firmware_data.
Cheers,
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists