linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: select consistently (Re: 2.6.19-rc5-mm1)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20061109033909.GA13729@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 8 Nov 2006 22:39:09 -0500
From:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Reuben Farrelly <reuben-linuxkernel@...b.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: select consistently (Re: 2.6.19-rc5-mm1)

On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 07:09:44PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
 
 > Why does arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/Kconfig say:
 > 
 > config X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ
 > 	tristate "ACPI Processor P-States driver"
 > 	select CPU_FREQ_TABLE
 > 	depends on ACPI_PROCESSOR
 > 
 > but arch/x86_64/kernel/cpufreq/Kconfig say:
 > 
 > config X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ
 > 	tristate "ACPI Processor P-States driver"
 > 	depends on ACPI_PROCESSOR
 > 
 > # NOTE: no "select" on the latter one.  // Randy

A better question might be why they're two separate Kconfig's.
x86-64 doesn't make its own copy of the drivers, so why are
the Kconfig's special ?

		Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/