[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1163154371.3138.663.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:26:11 +0100
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 12/19] high-res timers: core
On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 23:38 +0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> + * hrtimer callback modes:
> + *
> + * HRTIMER_CB_SOFTIRQ: Callback must run in softirq context
> + * HRTIMER_CB_IRQSAFE: Callback may run in hardirq context
> + * HRTIMER_CB_IRQSAFE_NO_RESTART: Callback may run in hardirq context and
> + * does not restart the timer
> + * HRTIMER_CB_IRQSAFE_NO_SOFTIRQ: Callback must run in softirq context
> + * Special mode for tick emultation
This naming is treacherous (or the comment is wrong); NO_SOFTIRQ
suggests "can't run in softirq" but your comment says "must run in
softirq".. which is it?
> +/**
> + * hrtimer_clock_notify - A clock source or a clock event has been installed
> + *
> + * Notify the per cpu softirqs to recheck the clock sources and events
> + */
> +void hrtimer_clock_notify(void)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + if (hrtimer_hres_enabled) {
> + for_each_possible_cpu(i)
hmm. possible or online or ..
If you fix the comment/define:
Acked-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
--
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com
Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists