[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4554552E.8050300@openvz.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:32:14 +0300
From: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>
To: balbir@...ibm.com
CC: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>, dev@...nvz.org,
ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net, haveblue@...ibm.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, rohitseth@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 6/8] RSS controller shares allocation
[snip]
>>> + for_each_child(child, res->rgroup) {
>>> + child_res = get_memctlr(child);
>>> + BUG_ON(!child_res);
>>> + recalc_and_propagate(child_res, res);
>> Recursion? Won't it eat all the stack in case of a deep tree?
>
> The depth of the hierarchy can be controlled. Recursion is needed
> to do a DFS walk
That's another point against recursion - bad root can
crash the kernel... If we are about to give container's
users ability to make their own subtrees then we *must*
avoid recursion. There's an algorithm that allows one
to walk the tree like this w/o recursion.
[snip]
>> I didn't find where in this patches this callback is called.
>
> It's a part of the resource groups infrastructure. It's been ported
> on top of Paul Menage's containers patches. The code can be easily
> adapted to work directly with containers instead of resource groups
> if required.
Could you please give me a link to the patch where this
is called?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists