[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <455484F0.3000506@garzik.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 08:56:00 -0500
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
CC: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@...il.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Aaron Durbin <adurbin@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
gregkh@...e.de, linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Subject: Re: [discuss] Re: 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v3)
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> We really should stop using MMCONFIG entirely, until we have a
> per-southbridge true knowledge of what the real decoding is. The BIOS
> tables for this are simply too damn unreliable.
FWIW: MMCONFIG is required for PCI domain support (or "PCI segments" as
ACPI calls them). Only a few mass market OEM boxes exist that need this
-- and they are all pretty new (Opteron multi-core) -- but more are coming.
I have a patch in -mm that works for this. Without the patch, my
sata_mv card and the machine's built-in MPT-Fusion do not appear at all
in PCI bus scans (nor do the associated hard drives) on this production
HP box. So far these machines are rare, /usually/ with a BIOS switch to
turn off PCI domains.
This says nothing about BIOS table reliability, of course. I agree that
MMCONFIG probing is highly unreliable at present. Whitelisting "<2007"
systems like Andi proposed may be the only option in some cases.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists