linux-kernel - Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20061110151555.GB7708@ucw.cz>
Date:	Fri, 10 Nov 2006 15:15:55 +0000
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
Cc:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Subject: Re: A proposal; making 2.6.20 a bugfix only version.

Hi!

> >but if you do this you just end up with a bigger 
> >backlog so that the
> >next one will even be more unstable due to a extreme 
> >high change rate.
> >
> Only if people continue to work on new stuff during the 
> "bug fixing only" cycle.
> If we manage to get everyone focused on bug fixing only 
> for the entire
> cycle the backlog won't be growing (much).

But neither you, nor andrew, nor linus has power to stop development
like that... (nor would it be good idea)

							Pavel
-- 
Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/