[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4554E7C1.1070705@sandeen.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 14:57:37 -0600
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>
To: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com>
CC: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] handle ext3 directory corruption better
Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 October 2006 04:57, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> Nice... can you run the same tool against fsck, too?
>
> I'll see if I can make that work, too. The fuzzer tries to preserve the bad
> image so that you can replay the problem for debugging. I think its just a
> matter of making another copy and using that one instead.
I played with this on xfs a little bit in my spare time, found some
xfs_repair problems. :) I'm sure other fs's would have issues as well.
Ideally it would probably be good for the tool to have a "use" mode (try
to use the corrupted fs) and a "check" mode (try to fsck the corrupted fs).
In use mode, it'd be: mkfs, fuzz, mount, populate (etc), unmount.
In check mode, it'd be: mkfs, mount, populate, unmount, fuzz, fsck.
-Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists