linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/02] Elf: Align elf notes properly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45550D2F.2070004@goop.org>
Date:	Fri, 10 Nov 2006 15:37:19 -0800
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
CC:	Horms <horms@...ge.net.au>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus@...inux.co.jp>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...ibm.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@....de>, fastboot@...ts.osdl.org,
	Dave Anderson <anderson@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/02] Elf: Align elf notes properly

Magnus Damm wrote:
> I see no point in aligning to 32-bit boundaries on 64-bit platforms.
> Their intention was most likely to align to the word size IMO, so this
> is most likely a "thinko" left over from whoever ported the code from
> 32-bit to 64-bit.

I don't think so.  Since Elf64 notes still have 32-bit values in them,
32-bit alignment seems the most sensible.  It would certainly be an
irritation to have Elf32 and Elf64 Notes with basically the same
definition, but with different alignments.

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/