| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <45578126.2000306@stud.feec.vutbr.cz> Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 21:16:38 +0100 From: Michal Schmidt <xschmi00@...d.feec.vutbr.cz> To: ranjith kumar <ranjit_kumar_b4u@...oo.co.uk> CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: privilege level of program which is called by call_usermodehelper() ranjith kumar wrote: > Hi, > > I think the program which is called by > call_usermodehelper() will not be executed at > privilege level zero on IA-32 machines. > Am I right? Right. Only the kernel runs in privilege level (ring) 0. > How to run a program which has been compiled by a > compiler(say gcc) at privilege level zero? You don't. Well, you could put it in the kernel... > Indeed I want to compare time taken in executing two > programs. If we run them at privilege level zero by > calling them in a kernel module, processor will not > switch to other processors. That's a false assumption. Even kernel code is preemptible nowadays. > So that we can find out > time taken to execute a program more accurately. If you run your program on an otherwise idle machine, the results should be pretty accurate. If you really think it matters, then run your program with real-time priority. > What you say?? > Thanks in advance. Michal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists