[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061112214540.GB31649@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 16:45:40 -0500
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Neil Brown <neilb@....unsw.edu.au>,
"bugme-daemon@...nel-bugs.osdl.org"
<bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alex@...snet.ru, mingo@...hat.com, ak@...e.de
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 7495] New: Kernel periodically hangs.
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 03:16:38PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> > > We KNOW it can't work on a sizable amount of machines. This is why it
> > > is a config option; you can enable it if YOUR machine is KNOWN to work,
> > > and you get some gains. But it's also understood that it often it won't
> > > work. So any sensible distro (since they have to aim for a wide
> > > audience) disables this option ...
> >
> > Nowadays, many distributions only ship CONFIG_SMP=y kernels...
>
> that's a calculated risk on their side (and they know that); they're
> balancing not functioning on a set of machines off against needing more
> kernels.
Andi has a nice patch in the suse kernel which adds heuristics to disable
apic on systems where it isn't likely to work. It DTRT in at least
one problem case that I know of. The actual fall-out from enabling
'run SMP kernels on UP i686' for FC6 has mostly been a non-event.
Literally a handful of cases, that will likely all get caught and worked
around by Andi's patch or similar.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists