[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1163340998.3293.131.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 15:16:38 +0100
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Neil Brown <neilb@....unsw.edu.au>,
"bugme-daemon@...nel-bugs.osdl.org"
<bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alex@...snet.ru, mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 7495] New: Kernel periodically hangs.
> > We KNOW it can't work on a sizable amount of machines. This is why it
> > is a config option; you can enable it if YOUR machine is KNOWN to work,
> > and you get some gains. But it's also understood that it often it won't
> > work. So any sensible distro (since they have to aim for a wide
> > audience) disables this option ...
>
> Nowadays, many distributions only ship CONFIG_SMP=y kernels...
that's a calculated risk on their side (and they know that); they're
balancing not functioning on a set of machines off against needing more
kernels.
> You miss my point.
>
> You said you'd suspect it to be turned off automatic most of the time,
> and that's the point I think you might be wrong at.
it won't be turned off on machines that support dual core processors
etc, since those DO get validated and designed for APIC use.. even if
you only stick a single core processor in. So yes you're right, that
nowadays is a pretty large group. But it's the safe group I guess:)
--
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com
Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists