linux-kernel - Re: [patch 2/4] permission mapping for sys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <eb97335b0611130917j18191c0ej3220b10c090d686f@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 13 Nov 2006 09:17:02 -0800
From:	"Zack Weinberg" <zackw@...ix.com>
To:	"Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc:	"Chris Wright" <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
	"Stephen Smalley" <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>, jmorris@...ei.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/4] permission mapping for sys_syslog operations

On 11/13/06, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 01:29 -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> > I thought the point of the "unifdef" thing was that it made a version
> > of the header with the __KERNEL__ section ripped out, for copying into
> > /usr/include, so you didn't have to do that ...
>
> yes it is, however it's mostly for existing stuff/seamless transition.
> It's a hack :)
> If you can avoid it lets do so; you already have the nice clean header,
> so lets not go backwards... you HAVE the clean separation.

ok, but I gotta ask that you tell me what to name the internal header,
I can't think of anything that isn't ugly.

zw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/