linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Re: linux-2.6.19-rc5-g088406bc build #120 failed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:06:16 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To:	Paul Fulghum <paulkf@...rogate.com>
Cc:	Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
	Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@....de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: linux-2.6.19-rc5-g088406bc build #120 failed

On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:40:34 -0600
Paul Fulghum <paulkf@...rogate.com> wrote:

> I know code is open to criticism,
> but after several weeks of submitting patches
> and getting no closer to acceptance I gave up.
> We were going around in circles where one person
> wanted some thing that conflicted with what
> another person wanted.

That happens sometimes.

I'd suggest that you send what you believe to be the correct change and see
if you can preempt the usual objections via the changelog.

I wouldn't say it's a high-priority thing, btw.  There are surely plenty of
won't-link config settings and few people are hurting from this one.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/