[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4559F781.6020607@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 09:06:09 -0800
From: Suleiman Souhlal <ssouhlal@...eBSD.org>
To: Shem Multinymous <multinymous@...il.com>
CC: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Linux Kernel ML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
vojtech@...e.cz, Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>,
Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@...lades.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Make the TSC safe to be used by gettimeofday().
Shem Multinymous wrote:
> On 11/14/06, Suleiman Souhlal <ssouhlal@...ebsd.org> wrote:
>
>> I believe that the results returned will always be monotonic, as long as
>> the frequency of the TSC does not change from under us (that is, without
>> the kernel knowing). This is because we "synchronize" each CPU's vxtime
>> with a global time source (HPET) every time we know the TSC rate changes.
>
>
> Does this hold after a suspend/resume cycle? You could be resuming
> with a different CPU clock than what you suspended with, and I'm not
> sure anything guarantees an early enough re-sync.
I have to admit that I didn't really design this patch with
suspend/resume in mind, and that I'm not too familiar with how they work.
Do the HPET/ACPI timers still run while the system is suspended?
If not, there shouldn't be any problem, as long as the kernel is
informed of the resume early enough.
-- Suleiman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists