[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200611140043.30714.len.brown@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 00:43:30 -0500
From: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Use dev_sysdata for ACPI and remove firmware_data
On Friday 10 November 2006 00:49, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 11:58:36AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > This patch changes ACPI to use the new dev_sysdata on x86 and x86_64 (is there
> > any other arch using ACPI ?) to store it's acpi_handle. It also removes the
> > firmware_data field from struct device as this was the only user.
>
> Yeah! I've wanted to drop firmware_data for a while now :)
device.firmware_data was born when we went to link Linux devices
and ACPI devices using device.platform_data and found it was already used.
You recommended we create a new field to avoid the conflict, and
IIR the discussion suggested that eventually device.platform_data use
would get cleaned up and the fields could perhaps some day be combined.
I don't know if we are any closer to that day, before or after this change.
However, I'm fine with Ben's re-name -- it changes no functionality on ACPI-enabled
systems while potentially deleting an unused pointer/dev on other architectures.
Please ship his patch #2 along with patch #1 that it depends on.
Acked-by: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
thanks
-Len
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists