[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200611140802.47705.luca.risolia@studio.unibo.it>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 08:02:47 +0100
From: Luca Risolia <luca.risolia@...dio.unibo.it>
To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@...land.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/33] usb: sn9c102_core free urb cleanup
> Hello,
>
>- usb_free_urb() cleanup
>
>Signed-off-by: Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@...land.pl>
>
>--- linux-2.6.19-rc4-orig/drivers/media/video/sn9c102/sn9c102_core.c 2006-11-06 17:07:45.000000000 +0100
>+++ linux-2.6.19-rc4/drivers/media/video/sn9c102/sn9c102_core.c 2006-11-06 19:57:35.000000000 +0100
>@@ -775,7 +775,7 @@ static int sn9c102_start_transfer(struct
> return 0;
>
> free_urbs:
>- for (i = 0; (i < SN9C102_URBS) && cam->urb[i]; i++)
>+ for (i = 0; i < SN9C102_URBS; i++)
> usb_free_urb(cam->urb[i]);
>
> free_buffers:
This patch might cause usb_free_urb() to fail if not all the URBs have been
allocated successfully: in this case, the original loop stops as soon as
cam->urb[i] == NULL (where NULL is given from the failed allocation),
while in the second loop there might be a not null cam->urb[i+n]
pointing to an URB that has already been deallocated elsewhere.
The same bug is present in PATCH 12/33.
Best regards,
Luca Risolia
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists