linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Incorrect MSI interrupt type name

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1163492461.4311.60.camel@ymzhang-perf.sh.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 14 Nov 2006 16:21:01 +0800
From:	"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Incorrect MSI interrupt type name

On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 15:43, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 15:22:57 +0800
> "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > /proc/interrupts shows "<NULL>" for MSI interrupt type name on
> > my ia64 machine.
> > 
> > Below patch against 2.6.19-rc5-mm1 fixes it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Zhang Yanmin <yanmin.zhang@...el.com>
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > --- linux-2.6.19-rc5-mm1/arch/ia64/kernel/msi_ia64.c	2006-11-14 14:16:12.000000000 +0800
> > +++ linux-2.6.19-rc5-mm1_fix/arch/ia64/kernel/msi_ia64.c	2006-11-14 15:08:37.000000000 +0800
> > @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ static int ia64_msi_retrigger_irq(unsign
> >   * Generic ops used on most IA64 platforms.
> >   */
> >  static struct irq_chip ia64_msi_chip = {
> > -	.name		= "PCI-MSI",
> > +	.typename	= "PCI-MSI",
> >  	.mask		= mask_msi_irq,
> >  	.unmask		= unmask_msi_irq,
> >  	.ack		= ia64_ack_msi_irq,
> 
> I think the bug is that ia64 is printing ->typename, whereas it should be
> printing ->name:
A couple of other arch also use typename instead of name when printing.

In addition, function irq_chip_set_defaults will let name=typename if
name is NULL.

Is it more reasonable to delete typename completely?

> 
> 
>  arch/ia64/kernel/iosapic.c |    2 +-
>  arch/ia64/kernel/irq.c     |    2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff -puN arch/ia64/kernel/iosapic.c~ia64-irqs-use-name-not-typename arch/ia64/kernel/iosapic.c
> --- a/arch/ia64/kernel/iosapic.c~ia64-irqs-use-name-not-typename
> +++ a/arch/ia64/kernel/iosapic.c
> @@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ register_intr (unsigned int gsi, int vec
>  			printk(KERN_WARNING
>  			       "%s: changing vector %d from %s to %s\n",
>  			       __FUNCTION__, vector,
> -			       idesc->chip->typename, irq_type->typename);
> +			       idesc->chip->name, irq_type->name);
>  		idesc->chip = irq_type;
>  	}
>  	return 0;
> diff -puN arch/ia64/kernel/irq.c~ia64-irqs-use-name-not-typename arch/ia64/kernel/irq.c
> --- a/arch/ia64/kernel/irq.c~ia64-irqs-use-name-not-typename
> +++ a/arch/ia64/kernel/irq.c
> @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ int show_interrupts(struct seq_file *p, 
>  			seq_printf(p, "%10u ", kstat_cpu(j).irqs[i]);
>  		}
>  #endif
> -		seq_printf(p, " %14s", irq_desc[i].chip->typename);
> +		seq_printf(p, " %14s", irq_desc[i].chip->name);
>  		seq_printf(p, "  %s", action->name);
>  
>  		for (action=action->next; action; action = action->next)
> _
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/