[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1061114002228.31156@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 11:22:28 +1100
From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 001 of 4] md: Fix innocuous bug in raid6 stripe_to_pdidx
stripe_to_pdidx finds the index of the parity disk for a given
stripe.
It assumes raid5 in that it uses "disks-1" to determine the number
of data disks.
This is incorrect for raid6 but fortunately the two usages cancel each
other out. The only way that 'data_disks' affects the calculation of
pd_idx in raid5_compute_sector is when it is divided into the
sector number. But as that sector number is calculated by multiplying
in the wrong value of 'data_disks' the division produces the right
value.
So it is innocuous but needs to be fixed.
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
### Diffstat output
./drivers/md/raid5.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff .prev/drivers/md/raid5.c ./drivers/md/raid5.c
--- .prev/drivers/md/raid5.c 2006-11-14 10:05:00.000000000 +1100
+++ ./drivers/md/raid5.c 2006-11-14 10:33:41.000000000 +1100
@@ -1355,8 +1355,10 @@ static int stripe_to_pdidx(sector_t stri
int pd_idx, dd_idx;
int chunk_offset = sector_div(stripe, sectors_per_chunk);
- raid5_compute_sector(stripe*(disks-1)*sectors_per_chunk
- + chunk_offset, disks, disks-1, &dd_idx, &pd_idx, conf);
+ raid5_compute_sector(stripe * (disks - conf->max_degraded)
+ *sectors_per_chunk + chunk_offset,
+ disks, disks - conf->max_degraded,
+ &dd_idx, &pd_idx, conf);
return pd_idx;
}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists