[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061115141735.GA18137@flower.upol.cz>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 14:17:35 +0000
From: Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>,
draconx@...il.com, jpdenheijer@...il.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: kbuild-mm: $(objtree)/knull vs mktemp (was Re: [PATCH -mm] replacement for broken kbuild-dont-put-temp-files-in-the-source-tree.patch)
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 01:27:57AM +0100, Horst Schirmeier wrote:
> # Immortal knull for mortals and roots
> define knull
> $(shell \
> if test ! -L knull; \
> then rm -f knull; ln -s /dev/null knull; \
> fi; \
> echo knull)
> endef
So, i think this is much better than mktemp and friends.
Current -mm have +4 temp files after every make help, make, make something.
I'm steel looking forward for comments from (busy) developers, like Sam.
Now i have my laptop back and i can finish this up. Hm?
____
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists