linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pci: Introduce pci_find

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20061115163556.0937531e@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:35:56 +0000
From:	Alan <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...l.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci: Introduce pci_find_present

On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 17:26:39 +0100
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 16:24 +0000, Alan wrote:
> > This works like pci_dev_present but instead of returning boolean returns
> > the matching pci_device_id entry. This makes it much more useful. Code
> > bloat is basically nil as the old boolean function is rewritten in terms
> > of the new one.
> > 
> 
> shouldn't this take a refcount on the device (which the user of this
> function then has to put again) ?

Nope. It is returning a pci_device_id from an array of pci_device_id
values that were passed into the function. It is not returning a pci
device so it does not require refcounts.

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/