[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <455B52CF.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:47:59 +0000
From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@...ell.com>
To: "linux-acpi" <linux-acpi@...el.com>,
"Mikael Pettersson" <mikpe@...uu.se>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] avoid compiler warnings
>>Pointers should not be casted to u32 as this results in compiler warnings
>>on 64-bit platforms.
>
>NAK. Use "%p" for formatting pointers. No casts needed.
Indeed, how did I not see this... While at this, I saw that there were a few
more instances that needed fixing (they weren't actively generating warnings
because of the build settings).
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>
--- linux-2.6.19-rc5/drivers/acpi/executer/exmutex.c 2006-09-20 05:42:06.000000000 +0200
+++ 2.6.19-rc5-acpi-warnings/drivers/acpi/executer/exmutex.c 2006-11-15 17:22:39.000000000 +0100
@@ -266,10 +266,10 @@ acpi_ex_release_mutex(union acpi_operand
walk_state->thread->thread_id)
&& (obj_desc->mutex.os_mutex != ACPI_GLOBAL_LOCK)) {
ACPI_ERROR((AE_INFO,
- "Thread %X cannot release Mutex [%4.4s] acquired by thread %X",
- (u32) walk_state->thread->thread_id,
+ "Thread %p cannot release Mutex [%4.4s] acquired by thread %p",
+ walk_state->thread->thread_id,
acpi_ut_get_node_name(obj_desc->mutex.node),
- (u32) obj_desc->mutex.owner_thread->thread_id));
+ obj_desc->mutex.owner_thread->thread_id));
return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_AML_NOT_OWNER);
}
--- linux-2.6.19-rc5/drivers/acpi/utilities/utmutex.c 2006-09-20 05:42:06.000000000 +0200
+++ 2.6.19-rc5-acpi-warnings/drivers/acpi/utilities/utmutex.c 2006-11-15 17:24:31.000000000 +0100
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ acpi_status acpi_ut_acquire_mutex(acpi_m
if (acpi_gbl_mutex_info[i].thread_id == this_thread_id) {
if (i == mutex_id) {
ACPI_ERROR((AE_INFO,
- "Mutex [%s] already acquired by this thread [%X]",
+ "Mutex [%s] already acquired by this thread [%p]",
acpi_ut_get_mutex_name
(mutex_id),
this_thread_id));
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ acpi_status acpi_ut_acquire_mutex(acpi_m
}
ACPI_ERROR((AE_INFO,
- "Invalid acquire order: Thread %X owns [%s], wants [%s]",
+ "Invalid acquire order: Thread %p owns [%s], wants [%s]",
this_thread_id,
acpi_ut_get_mutex_name(i),
acpi_ut_get_mutex_name(mutex_id)));
@@ -243,23 +243,23 @@ acpi_status acpi_ut_acquire_mutex(acpi_m
#endif
ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_MUTEX,
- "Thread %X attempting to acquire Mutex [%s]\n",
- (u32) this_thread_id, acpi_ut_get_mutex_name(mutex_id)));
+ "Thread %p attempting to acquire Mutex [%s]\n",
+ this_thread_id, acpi_ut_get_mutex_name(mutex_id)));
status = acpi_os_acquire_mutex(acpi_gbl_mutex_info[mutex_id].mutex,
ACPI_WAIT_FOREVER);
if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_MUTEX,
- "Thread %X acquired Mutex [%s]\n",
- (u32) this_thread_id,
+ "Thread %p acquired Mutex [%s]\n",
+ this_thread_id,
acpi_ut_get_mutex_name(mutex_id)));
acpi_gbl_mutex_info[mutex_id].use_count++;
acpi_gbl_mutex_info[mutex_id].thread_id = this_thread_id;
} else {
ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status,
- "Thread %X could not acquire Mutex [%X]",
- (u32) this_thread_id, mutex_id));
+ "Thread %p could not acquire Mutex [%X]",
+ this_thread_id, mutex_id));
}
return (status);
@@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ acpi_status acpi_ut_release_mutex(acpi_m
this_thread_id = acpi_os_get_thread_id();
ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_MUTEX,
- "Thread %X releasing Mutex [%s]\n", (u32) this_thread_id,
+ "Thread %p releasing Mutex [%s]\n", this_thread_id,
acpi_ut_get_mutex_name(mutex_id)));
if (mutex_id > ACPI_MAX_MUTEX) {
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists