[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061115182915.GA2705@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 19:29:15 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>, akpm@...l.org, ak@...e.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Michael.Fetterman@...cam.ac.uk,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...Source.com>
Subject: Re: i386 PDA patches use of %gs
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> > My test program does the same thing, except using GDT entries 6 and
> > 7 (selectors 0x33 and 0x3b).
>
> no, that's not what it does. It measures 50000000 switches of the
> _same_ selector value, without using any of the selectors in the loop
> itself. I.e. no mixing at all! But when the kernel and userspace uses
> %gs, it's the cost of switching between two selector values of %gs
> that has to be measured. Your code does not measure that at all,
> AFAICS.
for example, your test_fs() code does:
for(i = 0; i < COUNT; i++) {
asm volatile("push %%fs; mov %1, %%fs; addl $1, %%fs:%0; popl %%fs"
: "+m" (*offset): "r" (seg) : "memory");
sync();
}
that loads (and uses) a single selector value for %fs, and doesnt do any
mixed use as far as i can see.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists