[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <455B5FB6.7010009@goop.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 10:43:02 -0800
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>, akpm@...l.org, ak@...e.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Michael.Fetterman@...cam.ac.uk,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...Source.com>
Subject: Re: i386 PDA patches use of %gs
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> for example, your test_fs() code does:
>
> for(i = 0; i < COUNT; i++) {
> asm volatile("push %%fs; mov %1, %%fs; addl $1, %%fs:%0; popl %%fs"
> : "+m" (*offset): "r" (seg) : "memory");
> sync();
> }
>
> that loads (and uses) a single selector value for %fs, and doesnt do any
> mixed use as far as i can see.
I'm not sure what you're getting at. Each loop iteration is analogous
to a user->kernel->user transition with respect to the
save/reload/use/restore pattern on the segment register. In this case,
%fs starts as a null selector, gets reloaded with a non NULL selector,
and then is restored to null. Do you mean some other mixing?
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists