[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0611151105560.3349@woody.osdl.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:07:59 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, discuss@...-64.org,
William Cohen <wcohen@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
Komuro <komurojun-mbn@...ty.com>,
Ernst Herzberg <earny@...4u.de>,
Andre Noll <maan@...temlinux.org>,
oprofile-list@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, phil.el@...adoo.fr,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...l.org>,
Prakash Punnoor <prakash@...noor.de>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Alex Romosan <romosan@...orax.lbl.gov>, gregkh@...e.de,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@...l.ru>
Subject: Re: [discuss] Re: 2.6.19-rc5: known regressions (v3)
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >
> > Meanwhile we should restore the NMI counter to fix this bug.
>
> No, it was always oprofile who was buggy here, silently taking
> the nmi watchdog away.
Andi, your "blame game" doesn't matter.
The fact is, it used to work, and the kernel changed interfaces, so now it
doesn't.
In other words, a kernel interface to user land changed. THAT IS ALWAYS A
BUG. We don't change UI.
Yes, "oprofile" should be fixed to not depend on that, but the kernel
shouldn't change the interfaces, and we should add back the zero entry.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists