lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 23:25:33 +0100 From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> To: William D Waddington <william.waddington@...zmo.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFCLUE3] flagging kernel interface changes > I don't want to start an argument about "stable_api_nonsense" or the > wisdom of out-of-tree drivers. Just curious about the - why - and > whether it is indifference or antagonism toward drivers outside the > fold. Or ??? Hi, in general the best approach has been to make the driver support the NEW interface, and then do some compat thing to fake the old one. The other way around is going to be MUCH more painful long term. So as general rule: always follow the latest API, and use a compat.h hack for older kernels inside your driver, but keep the normal code clean. It's not always easy, but keeping old API and faking it to the new one is only going to be really really painful; things will deviate more and more over time and at some point you'll have to jump anyway. In addition quite a few api changes are done in a way that make this less painful than the other way around.. however in general really there is pain to be out-of-tree; and to some degree that's an incentive to merge back :) > - > if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com > Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists