[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <455B98AA.3040904@mbligh.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 14:46:02 -0800
From: Martin Bligh <mbligh@...igh.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc: Christian Krafft <krafft@...ibm.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] enables booting a NUMA system where some nodes have
no memory
Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Nov 2006, Martin Bligh wrote:
>
>> A node is an arbitrary container object containing one or more of:
>>
>> CPUs
>> Memory
>> IO bus
>>
>> It does not have to contain memory.
>
> I have never seen a node on Linux without memory. I have seen nodes
> without processors and without I/O but not without memory.This seems to be
> something new?
A node was always defined that way. Search back a few years in the lkml
archives. We may be finding bugs in the implementation, but the
definition has not changed.
Supposing we hot-unplugged all the memory in a node? Or seems to have
happened in this instance is boot with mem=, cutting out memory on that
node.
M.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists