[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200611151356.52985.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 13:56:52 -0800
From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To: Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc5 nasty ACPI regression, AE_TIME errors
On Wednesday 15 November 2006 6:48 am, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> ec1.patch
>
>
> Always enable GPE after return from notify handler.
>
> From: Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@...ux.intel.com>
>
>
> ---
Yes, this seems to resolve the regression as well as Len's ec_intr=0 boot param.
IMO this should get merged into 2.6.19 ASAP ...
> drivers/acpi/ec.c | 2 --
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/ec.c b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
> index e6d4b08..937eafc 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
> @@ -465,8 +465,6 @@ static u32 acpi_ec_gpe_handler(void *dat
>
> if (value & ACPI_EC_FLAG_SCI) {
> status = acpi_os_execute(OSL_EC_BURST_HANDLER, acpi_ec_gpe_query, ec);
> - return status == AE_OK ?
> - ACPI_INTERRUPT_HANDLED : ACPI_INTERRUPT_NOT_HANDLED;
> }
> acpi_enable_gpe(NULL, ec->gpe_bit, ACPI_ISR);
> return status == AE_OK ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists