linux-kernel - linux io_submit syscall duration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5d96567b0611142339k23e78cc6u19b64052be5cd360@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 15 Nov 2006 09:39:14 +0200
From:	"Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro)" <raziebe@...il.com>
To:	linux-aio@...ck.org, "Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	bcrl@...ck.org, zach.brown@...cle.com
Subject: linux io_submit syscall duration

Bnejamin hello.

My name is raz and i have encountered a problem with  io_submit.
The maximum duration of a single io_submit operation when
heavily stressing the system with large number of big (1MB) ios,
reaches several hundereds ms.

I have been profiling it and it seems that the problem is the
file->f_op->aio_read operation,
a call that is made in fs/aio.c when coming from:
 sys_io_submit -->
   io_submit_one -->
	  aio_run_iocb -->
   		 *retry

The test is initiating several hundered 1MB IOs over a single block device.

I understand that the assumption made was aio_read is asynchronous and no
delay will occure, but isn't possible to do it in the workqueue context ?

would appreciate your help.
thank you

raz
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/