linux-kernel - Re: strange behaviour with x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 16 Nov 2006 12:38:25 +0000 (UTC)
From:	Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject:  Re: strange behaviour with x86_64

On 2006-11-15, Fabio Coatti wrote:
> Hi all,

I'm just trying to move things forward, i'm not a developer.

> I'm seeing a strange behaviour on a dual opteron machine (or, at least it seem 
> so to me) and I need some advice.
> The hardware is: dual opteron 2.4, dual core, 2GB ram
> This machine runs apache webserver/mod_perl. Due to some bug in perl code, 
> often the machine runs out of memory, and oomkiller triggers.

You seem to run very interesting distribution; when reporting
*kernel* bugs (things), try to follow REPORTING-BUGS (in top dir. of kernel
sources): version (ver_linux), adding to CC list memory management
list from MAINTAINERS file.

As for me, kernel in oom condition is very bad thing. I don't think
"oom killer" idea is working in general (while it helps to link
allyesconfig kernel on 1G without swap ;).

Thus, i suggest you to play with stuff, described in
"Documentation/vm/overcommit-accounting".
____

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/