[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1163710333.28060.1.camel@lappy>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 21:52:12 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...esys.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [patch] cpufreq: mark cpufreq_tsc() as core_initcall_sync
On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 21:15 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> Subject: [patch] cpufreq: mark cpufreq_tsc() as core_initcall_sync
>
> init_cpufreq_transition_notifier_list() should execute first, which is a
> core_initcall, so mark cpufreq_tsc() core_initcall_sync.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
>
> --- linux.orig/arch/x86_64/kernel/tsc.c
> +++ linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/tsc.c
it seems to want to be arch/x86_64/kernel/time.c
> @@ -138,7 +138,11 @@ static int __init cpufreq_tsc(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -core_initcall(cpufreq_tsc);
> +/*
> + * init_cpufreq_transition_notifier_list() should execute first,
> + * which is a core_initcall, so mark this one core_initcall_sync:
> + */
> +core_initcall_sync(cpufreq_tsc);
>
> #endif
> /*
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists