linux-kernel - Re: changing internal kernel system mechanism in runtime by a module patch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 16 Nov 2006 13:12:43 -0800
From:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...l.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: changing internal kernel system mechanism in runtime by a
 module patch

On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 21:19:50 +0200
"Yitzchak Eidus" <ieidus@...il.com> wrote:

> is it possible to replace linux kernel internal functions such as
> schdule () to lets say my_schdule ()  in a run time with a module
> patch???
> (so that every call in the kernel to schdule() will go to my_schdule()... ) ???
> 
> i am talking about a clean/standard way to do such thing
> (without overwrite the mem address of the function and replace it in a
> dirty way...)
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Look at kprobe/jprobe.

-- 
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...l.org>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/