linux-kernel - Re: BUG: cpufreq notification broken

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 16 Nov 2006 22:36:34 +0100
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...esys.com>
To:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
	john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Subject: Re: BUG: cpufreq notification broken

On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 16:26 -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> 
> > There is another issue with this SRCU change:
> > 
> > The notification comes actually after the real change, which is bad. We
> > try to make the TSC usable by backing it with pm_timer accross such
> > states, but this behaviour breaks the safety code.
> 
> I don't understand.  Sending notifications is completely separate from 
> setting up the notifier chain's head.  The patch you mentioned didn't 
> touch the code that sends the notifications.

Yeah, my bad. It just uses rcu based locking, but its still synchronous.

I have to dig deeper, why the change of the frequency happens _before_
the notifier arrives.

	tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/