[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200611160126.02016.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 01:26:01 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc: Martin Bligh <mbligh@...igh.org>,
Christian Krafft <krafft@...ibm.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] enables booting a NUMA system where some nodes have no memory
On Wednesday 15 November 2006 23:41, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Nov 2006, Martin Bligh wrote:
> > A node is an arbitrary container object containing one or more of:
> >
> > CPUs
> > Memory
> > IO bus
+ SPUs on a Cell processor
> > It does not have to contain memory.
>
> I have never seen a node on Linux without memory. I have seen nodes
> without processors and without I/O but not without memory.This seems to be
> something new?
In this particular case, we have a dual-socket Cell/B.E. blade server,
where each of the two CPU-socket/south-bridge/memory combinations is
treated as a separate node. The two points that make this tricky
are:
- we want to be able to boot with the 'mem=512M' option, which effectively
disables the memory on the second node (each node has 512MiB).
- Each node has 8 SPUs, all of which we want to use. In order to use an
SPU, we call __add_pages to register the local memory on it, so we have
struct page pointers we can hand out to user mappings with ->nopage().
The __add_pages call needs to do node local allocations (there are
probably more allocations that have the same problem, but this is the
first one that crashes), which oops when there is no memory registered
at all for that node, instead of returning an error or falling back
on a non-local allocation.
Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists