linux-kernel - Re: [discuss] Re: 2.6.19-rc5: known regressions (v3)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <17757.34795.689658.106603@alkaid.it.uu.se>
Date:	Fri, 17 Nov 2006 10:59:07 +0100
From:	Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc:	Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>,
	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman),
	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
	discuss@...-64.org, William Cohen <wcohen@...hat.com>,
	Komuro <komurojun-mbn@...ty.com>,
	Ernst Herzberg <earny@...4u.de>,
	Andre Noll <maan@...temlinux.org>,
	oprofile-list@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, phil.el@...adoo.fr,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...l.org>,
	Prakash Punnoor <prakash@...noor.de>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
	Alex Romosan <romosan@...orax.lbl.gov>, gregkh@...e.de,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@...l.ru>
Subject: Re: [discuss] Re: 2.6.19-rc5: known regressions (v3)

Andrew Morton writes:
 > On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 11:55:46 +0100
 > Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se> wrote:
 > 
 > > Andrew Morton writes:
 > >  > Surely the appropriate behaviour is to allow oprofile to steal the NMI and
 > >  > to then put the NMI back to doing the watchdog thing after oprofile has
 > >  > finished with it.
 > > 
 > > Which is _exactly_ what pre-2.6.19-rc1 kernels did. I implemented
 > > the in-kernel API allowing real performance counter drivers like
 > > oprofile (and perfctr) to claim the HW from the NMI watchdog,
 > > do their work, and then release it which resumed the watchdog.
 > 
 > OK.  But from Andi's comments it seems that the NMI watchdog was failing to
 > resume its operation.

It certainly worked when I originally implemented it. If it didn't work
that way before 2.6.19-rc1 butchered it then that would have been a bug
that should have been fixed.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/