[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <slrnelr8ji.7lr.olecom@flower.upol.cz>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 11:45:07 +0000 (UTC)
From: Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.19-rc6] Documentation/rtc.txt updates (for rtc class)
Hallo, David.
On 2006-11-17, David Brownell wrote:
> This updates the RTC documentation to summarize the two APIs now available:
> the old PC/AT one, and the new RTC class drivers. It also updates the
> included "rtctest.c" file to better meet Linux style guidelines, and to
> work with the new RTC drivers.
How about documenting things you've told me back in September? I.e.
i386/amd64 have motorola RTC (and clones) based system clock setup in
boot sequence "arch/x86_64/kernel/time.c". Also, how it interferes
with time_hpet.c? There seem to be confusion what RTC timer and
RTC clock is: <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=386226>
Also util-linux package maintaining was under question in lkml
recently. I think, i should update rc script i rewrote for hwclock
with more info. I agree with you, that on PC hwclock is useless,
unless dual-boot users are not in consern.
I'll try to review and test patches. I wonder, why they were not posted
before, but just before 2.6.19?
Thanks!
____
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists