linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] Make x86_64 udelay() round up instead of down

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200611172318.47578.blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
Date:	Fri, 17 Nov 2006 23:18:47 +0100
From:	Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@...oo.it>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <ak@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Make x86_64 udelay() round up instead of down - try2

On Friday 17 November 2006 23:00, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 20:30:47 +0100
>
> "Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso" <blaisorblade@...oo.it> wrote:
> > Port two patches from i386 to x86_64 delay.c to make sure all rounding is
> > done upward instead of downward.
>
> Andi already has a patch in his, tree, only it's different.
>
> ftp://ftp.firstfloor.org/pub/ak/x86_64/quilt-current/patches/make-x86_64-ud
>elay-round-up-instead-of-down.
Ok, a fixed-up version of what I sent - I implemented Pavel's suggestion, the 
the choice is just a taste matter.
-- 
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can add them to my list!
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! 
 http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/