[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061116202854.cbd24bef.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 20:28:54 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: akpm <akpm@...l.org>, y-goto@...fujitsu.com,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, kmannth@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: memory hotplug function redefinition/confusion
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 20:25:20 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> 2.6.19-rc5-mm2:
>
> include/linux/memory_hotplug.h uses CONFIG_NUMA to decide:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> extern int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start);
> #else
> static inline int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> #endif
>
> but mm/init.c uses CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA to decide:
>
> #ifndef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
> int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(memory_add_physaddr_to_nid);
> #endif
>
> #ifndef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
> int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> #endif
>
> (sic: duplicate function above)
>
> The CONFIG_NUMA vs. CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA seems to cause this build error:
>
> CC arch/x86_64/mm/init.o
> arch/x86_64/mm/init.c:501: error: redefinition of 'memory_add_physaddr_to_nid'
> include/linux/memory_hotplug.h:71: error: previous definition of 'memory_add_phys
> addr_to_nid' was here
> arch/x86_64/mm/init.c:509: error: redefinition of 'memory_add_physaddr_to_nid'
> arch/x86_64/mm/init.c:501: error: previous definition of 'memory_add_physaddr_to_
> nid' was here
> make[1]: *** [arch/x86_64/mm/init.o] Error 1
> make: *** [arch/x86_64/mm] Error 2
Actually no flavor of NUMA is set:
http://oss.oracle.com/~rdunlap/configs/config-numa-err
---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists