lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061118063802.GE30547@bingen.suse.de>
Date:	Sat, 18 Nov 2006 07:38:02 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, olecom@...wer.upol.cz,
	vgoyal@...ibm.com, akpm@...l.org, rjw@...k.pl,
	ebiederm@...ssion.com, hpa@...or.com,
	Reloc Kernel List <fastboot@...ts.osdl.org>, pavel@...e.cz,
	magnus.damm@...il.com, ak@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/20] x86_64: Move CPU verification code to common file

> May hang be done optional? There was a discussion about applying
> "panic" reboot timeout here. Is it possible to implement somehow?

It would be tricky, but might be possible.  But that would be a completely
new feature -- the kernel has always hung in this case. If you think you need 
it submit a (followup) patch. But I don't think it's fair to ask Vivek to do it.

Besides i don't think it would be any useful. panic reboot only
makes sense if you can recover after reboot. But if your CPU somehow
suddenly loses its ability to run 64bit code, no reboot of the world will 
recover.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ